When I wrote the short gamebook
The Empire's Edge, I pictured an adventure in a land seldom explored by literature; my own homeland. I could have just wrote a story about a mighty whitey saving a native princess or a native hero who defeats the evil colonialists. However that would have made the story very typical. I chose to bite directly at the subject of imperialism for it spices the story suitably. It was a sensitive topic so massive research and planning ensued.
In the course of it, I realised that the modern perception of imperialism is very odious. This is especially true if you are coming from European countries. A mere mention of the word 'colonies' would afflict a westerner with an uncomfortable silence. Understandable. After World War II, the once noble notion of empire building had by then tasted poorly in everyone's mouth. So predictably, when people read it, comments came back asking 'why are you glorifying something so distasteful?'
The answer is simple; imperialism and colonialism was not all bad.
It's an action story of a fictional native hero who killed the evil colonialist. Would have been fun if I did not know where Sarawak is.
I may have reached that personal conclusion philosophically. I wanted to portray truthfully how the people were back in the days and truthfully, the colonised did not all loath the idea of being governed by a foreign power. The image of the native colonies giving the British Empire the middle finger and rejoicing to be finally rid of their evil overlords as the empire crumbled was not all true. Case in point, a passage from the first prime minister of Malaysia's independence speech:
"For many years past our fortunes have been linked with those of Great Britain and we recall in particular the comradeship of two world wars. We remember too the products of our association; justice before the law, the legacy of an efficient public service and the highest standard of living in Asia. We shall therefore always remember with gratitude the assistance which we have received from Great Britain down our long path to nationhood; an assistance which culminated today with the proclamation of Malaya’s Independence."
-Tunku Abdul Rahman
Even from old manuscripts and journals in Penang during 1800s, the voices of old did not seem disgruntled to be ruled by a foreign power. To make it easier to explain, I will list out common perceptions of how would the colonised react to being colonised and then provide some of my input.
1) The people would have been very unhappy that their ruler is foreign.
True, but only in the later time period. In the 1800s, nationalism was unheard of. The natives' understanding of politics was very simple, the king protects and the people serve. It did not matter what colour the king's skin was and the East India Company was a fair king. True, the laws were unfair but it installed order; their laws were clearer and they had the manpower and money to enforce it.
2) The colonialists brought slavery and indentured labour. The people suffered.
Yes, slavery was bad and it was older than feudalism. Even before Europeans set foot in the East Indies, slavery was a common practice; imperialism just expanded the market. Ironically, it was the British Empire who brought a empire-wide abolishment of slavery. We have Wilberforce to thank for it.
Indentured labour however was a morally grey area. But to put it into a native's perspective, a choice between starving to death and working for low wages in a far away land was not a hard choice to make for most.
3) The people were poor, because the colonialists sucked all the wealth.
It would seem that taxes and the conspiring to keep native's labour pay low damages a nation's wealth. However, being a colony means the people had access to technology, capital, and a law system conducive to business. One could still be wealthy beyond what they could have achieved before colonialism if they worked really hard and the people knew it.
4) The people resented being bullied by the colonialists and their cannons and ships.
If you were a local ruler, yes you would. But to the common lay man, it was either being bullied by European muskets or the local ruler's home-grown spears.
It may sound like I am praising colonialism but I assure you the opposite; colonialism is grey. Colonialism has its bad sides, though to discuss it is to beat an already dead horse. Thus my characters all had differing view points of colonialism to show readers that in those days, the people had a love-hate relationship with the British Empire.